Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CAT stock price vs TWI: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TWI's multiple
Needs TWI P/E.
Implied fair value · at CAT's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, CAT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CATERPILLAR INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
TITAN INTERNATIONAL, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
DEERE & CO
CAT vs DE
CUMMINS INC
CAT vs CMI
Parker-Hannifin Corp
CAT vs PH
TEREX CORP
CAT vs TEX
AGCO CORP /DE
CAT vs AGCO
CNH Industrial N.V.
CAT vs CNHI
NUCOR CORP
CAT vs NUE
STEEL DYNAMICS INC
CAT vs STLD
UNITED STATES STEEL CORP
CAT vs X
KAISER ALUMINUM CORP
CAT vs KALU
RELIANCE, INC.
CAT vs RS
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CAT can sustain its 4.3% revenue growth and 24.0% ROIC while justifying a premium multiple, then hold or only selectively add; otherwise, reduce exposure because the stock is priced far above both TWI-implied value and the DCF range.
On a P/S basis, CAT’s implied price of $36.65 versus a current price of $830.03 suggests a -95.6% gap, indicating the market is valuing CAT at a far richer multiple than the TWI anchor implies. The gap is driven by CAT’s much stronger profitability and growth profile, but the magnitude still points to a steep premium rather than a discount.
Supporting Metrics
