Maplebear Inc.
$11.84B- Market cap
- $11.83B
- Debt
- +$699.00M
- Cash
- −$687.00M
Capital structure 94% equity / 6% debt · EV / Revenue 3.16x · EV / EBITDA 20.99x
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · Mkt capMarket cap $11.83B · View financials
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
FY 2025 ·
Decision snapshot: CART stock price vs WTS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WTS's multiple
Needs WTS P/E.
Implied fair value · at CART's multiple
Needs CART P/E.
Snapshot Sep 4, 4:00 PM ET
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Multiple discount
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: CART FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · WTS FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Capital structure 94% equity / 6% debt · EV / Revenue 3.16x · EV / EBITDA 20.99x
Capital structure 98% equity / 2% debt · EV / Revenue 4.90x · EV / EBITDA 22.85x
WTS carries the larger enterprise value at $11.96B against $11.84B; CART trades on the lower EV / Revenue multiple (3.16x vs 4.90x); CART on the lower EV / EBITDA (20.99x vs 22.85x).
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
MAPLEBEAR INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
0.28x
0.10x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
0.02x
-0.40x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$687.00M
$405.50M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
DoorDash, Inc.
CART vs DASH
Uber Technologies, Inc
CART vs UBER
Lyft, Inc.
CART vs LYFT
TaskUs, Inc.
CART vs TASK
Genpact LTD
CART vs G
Concentrix Corp
CART vs CNXC
SMITH A O CORP
CART vs AOS
Xylem Inc.
CART vs XYL
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp
CART vs ZWS
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
CART vs WMS
MASCO CORP /DE/
CART vs MAS
$699.00M
$197.70M
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
The deterministic comparison remains available. Sign in when you want an on-demand narrative synthesis of the same data.