Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CAL stock price vs NKE: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NKE's multiple
Needs NKE P/S.
Implied fair value · at CAL's multiple
Needs Revenue / share, CAL P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CALERES, INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NIKE, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Crocs, Inc.
CAL vs CROX
DECKERS OUTDOOR CORP
CAL vs DECK
SKECHERS USA INC
CAL vs SKX
STEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
CAL vs SHOO
GENESCO INC
CAL vs GCO
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR CO
CAL vs COLM
Under Armour, Inc.
CAL vs UAA
lululemon athletica inc.
CAL vs LULU
V F CORP
CAL vs VFC
RALPH LAUREN CORP
CAL vs RL
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CAL can improve margins and sustain profitability without increasing leverage, then the current discount may be attractive because NKE-based valuation gap is very large; otherwise, the low multiple looks justified by CAL’s weak quality and near-zero earnings.
CAL trades at a much lower valuation than NKE on both P/S and EV/Revenue, which explains the large implied upside from NKE-based model. However, the market is also pricing in CAL’s far weaker earnings quality and minimal profitability, so the gap is not purely a mispricing signal.
Supporting Metrics
