The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$215.73M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: CAKE stock price vs YUM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at YUM's multiple
Needs YUM P/E.
Implied fair value · at CAKE's multiple
Needs CAKE P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
11 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY INCORPORATED · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
YUM! BRANDS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
CAKE vs BLMN
RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS INC
CAKE vs RRGB
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC
CAKE vs DRI
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC
CAKE vs CBRL
McDonald's Corporation
CAKE vs MCD
Starbucks Corporation
CAKE vs SBUX
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
CAKE vs CMG
DOMINOS PIZZA INC
CAKE vs DPZ
Wendy's Co
CAKE vs WEN
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe CAKE can sustain its current growth while materially improving margins and returns toward YUM levels, then the stock could justify re-rating closer to YUM-implied price because its current earnings multiple is below YUM’s and the implied upside is 25.8%.
CAKE trades at 21.6x P/E versus YUM at 27.2x, and on that basis YUM-implied price suggests 25.8% upside to $83.18 from the current $66.13. However, CAKE is also far cheaper on sales and EBITDA multiples, which aligns with its materially weaker operating profile.
Supporting Metrics