Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BXP stock price vs UDR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at UDR's multiple
Needs UDR P/E.
Implied fair value · at BXP's multiple
Needs BXP P/E.
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
BXP, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
UDR, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
BXP vs CSGP
WELLTOWER INC.
BXP vs WELL
Prologis, Inc.
BXP vs PLD
Public Storage
BXP vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
BXP vs EQR
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC
BXP vs AVB
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
BXP vs CPT
MID AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES INC.
BXP vs MAA
APARTMENT INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT CO
BXP vs AIV
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BXP's superior ROIC (13.1%) and materially lower leverage (Net Debt/EBITDA 1.1x vs UDR 7.7x) will drive relative outperformance, then overweight BXP because it trades inside its historical band with limited downside (~-1.7% vs UDR-implied P/E); otherwise prefer UDR given its stronger net income and net margin (22.1%).
BXP's current price ($55.03) sits essentially in line with UDR-implied P/E valuation ($54.08), implying limited downside (~-1.7%). UDR-implied valuation range is very wide ($54.08 - $147.94), while BXP also trades inside its historical band ($49.53 - $60.53), suggesting valuation is neither a clear bargain nor a clear premium.
Supporting Metrics
