Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BRX stock price vs WPC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WPC's multiple
Needs WPC P/E.
Implied fair value · at BRX's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, BRX P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
16 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
W. P. Carey Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
KIMCO REALTY CORP
BRX vs KIM
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
BRX vs REG
MACERICH CO
BRX vs MAC
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC /DE/
BRX vs SPG
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
BRX vs FRT
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
BRX vs ARE
REALTY INCOME CORP
BRX vs O
ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.
BRX vs EPRT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BRX can sustain its current margins while narrowing the leverage gap versus WPC, then BRX looks attractive on the P/E-based upside to $36.60 because the stock is cheaper on P/E and P/S than WPC; otherwise, the mixed operating profile and heavier balance-sheet risk argue for a neutral stance.
BRX trades at a discount to WPC-based implied value, with current price $31.53 versus implied price $36.60, suggesting 16.1% upside on the P/E framework. However, that gap is not pure mispricing: WPC carries higher revenue growth and stronger EBITDA/gross margins, which helps explain its richer multiple.
Supporting Metrics
