Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BN stock price vs KRC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KRC's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KRC P/E.
Implied fair value · at BN's multiple
Needs BN P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
BROOKFIELD CORPORATION · implied price per share
The ordinary-share to listed-security ratio could not be verified.
KILROY REALTY CORP · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BN’s high P/E is distorted by earnings normalization and that its valuation should be judged more on sales and DCF/historical bands, then hold or accumulate selectively because the current price remains inside both the historical band and DCF range; if you instead believe margin efficiency and leverage should dominate, BN looks expensive versus KRC on earnings and debt metrics.
On a P/E basis, BN trades at 83.4x versus KRC at 16.7x, which points to a large apparent premium for BN. However, BN also trades below KRC on P/S at 1.3x versus 4.1x and roughly in line to slightly below on EV/Revenue at 5.4x versus 5.9x, suggesting the headline earnings multiple gap is not fully mirrored across sales-based measures.
Supporting Metrics
