Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BLK stock price vs KKR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KKR's multiple
Needs KKR P/E.
Implied fair value · at BLK's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, BLK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
BlackRock, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
KKR & CO. INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
STATE STREET CORP
BLK vs STT
NORTHERN TRUST CORP
BLK vs NTRS
PRICE T ROWE GROUP INC
BLK vs TROW
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
BLK vs GS
Morgan Stanley
BLK vs MS
Blackstone Inc.
BLK vs BX
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
BLK vs APO
Carlyle Group Inc.
BLK vs CG
Ares Management Corp
BLK vs ARES
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BLK can sustain its 18.7% revenue growth and 22.9% net margin while KKR’s weaker growth persists, then BLK is the better relative choice because it combines stronger fundamentals with lower leverage despite only moderate valuation upside.
On the provided P/E basis, BLK appears cheaper than KKR at 30.9x versus 38.1x, which supports the idea that BLK’s earnings quality is being rewarded less aggressively than KKR’s. However, the implied price of $1,347.03 suggests only 23.5% upside from the current $1,090.39, and the DCF range of $354.76-$479.96 sits far below market, signaling major model-versus-multiple disagreement.
Supporting Metrics
