Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BKH stock price vs CLFD: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CLFD's multiple
Needs CLFD P/E.
Implied fair value · at BKH's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, BKH P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Black Hills Corporation · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
CLEARFIELD, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
ALLETE INC
BKH vs ALE
IDACORP INC
BKH vs IDA
NISOURCE INC.
BKH vs NI
PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORP
BKH vs PNW
Duke Energy CORP
BKH vs DUK
Evergy, Inc.
BKH vs EVRG
CORNING INC /NY
BKH vs GLW
CIENA CORP
BKH vs CIEN
CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
BKH vs COMM
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
BKH vs CSCO
JUNIPER NETWORKS INC
BKH vs JNPR
COMCAST CORP
BKH vs CMCSA
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BKH can sustain its 8.6% revenue growth and 23.3% operating margin without meaningful balance-sheet deterioration, then the stock looks attractive versus CLFD on a relative value basis because BKH is more profitable, grows faster, and still trades below CLFD-implied price.
BKH’s current price of $73.81 sits below the implied price of $94.16, suggesting 27.6% upside on CLFD-based P/S framework. The stock is also above the historical band low of $66.43 but below the DCF upper end of $91.39, which points to a valuation that is neither deeply cheap nor expensive.
Supporting Metrics
