Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BELFA stock price vs LFUS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LFUS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, LFUS P/E.
Implied fair value · at BELFA's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, BELFA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
BEL FUSE INC /NJ · implied price per share
A valid share-count denominator is required for the selected valuation policy.
LITTELFUSE INC /DE · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TE Connectivity plc
BELFA vs TEL
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
BELFA vs AMAT
ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC.
BELFA vs ALK
AMPHENOL CORP /DE/
BELFA vs APH
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC
BELFA vs VSH
Eaton Corp plc
BELFA vs ETN
ABB LTD
BELFA vs ABLZF
Sensata Technologies Holding plc
BELFA vs ST
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
BELFA vs EMR
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BELFA can sustain its superior margins and growth while re-rating closer to even a fraction of LFUS’s valuation multiples, then BELFA looks attractive because its current price is far below both LFUS-implied and DCF ranges despite stronger operating metrics.
BELFA trades at a sharp discount to LFUS across P/S, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, and P/E, despite stronger current operating performance. The provided LFUS-implied valuation is far above both BELFA’s current price and its historical/DCF bands, indicating the main question is whether LFUS’s premium multiple is sustainable rather than whether BELFA is cheap.
Supporting Metrics
