Brandywine Realty Trust
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$32.28M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BDN stock price vs WELL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WELL's multiple
Needs WELL P/S.
Implied fair value · at BDN's multiple
Needs BDN P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Brandywine Realty Trust · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
WELLTOWER INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BXP, Inc.
BDN vs BXP
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
BDN vs HIW
KILROY REALTY CORP
BDN vs KRC
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
BDN vs SLG
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
BDN vs VNO
Ventas, Inc.
BDN vs VTR
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS INC
BDN vs OHI
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
BDN vs CSGP
Prologis, Inc.
BDN vs PLD
Public Storage
BDN vs PSA
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
BDN vs EQR
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BDN can reverse revenue decline and restore consistent net profitability, then consider the stock as a speculative value play because the current price sits far below the P/S-based implied value and below DCF estimates; otherwise, the low-quality and highly leveraged profile argues for caution.
The P/S comparison implies a very large gap: BDN trades at $3.26 versus a P/S-implied price of $42.87, or 1215.0% upside. However, the comparison also shows BDN’s own historical band is only $2.93 to $3.59, suggesting the current price is near the recent trading range rather than obviously mispriced on a normalized basis.
Supporting Metrics