Brandywine Realty Trust
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$32.28M
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BDN stock price vs PKG: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PKG's multiple
Needs PKG P/S.
Implied fair value · at BDN's multiple
Needs BDN P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Brandywine Realty Trust · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BXP, Inc.
BDN vs BXP
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
BDN vs HIW
KILROY REALTY CORP
BDN vs KRC
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
BDN vs SLG
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
BDN vs VNO
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/
BDN vs IP
SONOCO PRODUCTS CO
BDN vs SON
GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO
BDN vs GPK
CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.
BDN vs CCK
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BDN can stabilize revenue and improve profitability without worsening leverage, then BDN could be attractive at $3.24 because the current price is well below PKG-implied and DCF ranges; otherwise, the valuation gap is justified by weak earnings quality and balance-sheet risk.
BDN trades at $3.24, below its historical band of $2.92-$3.56 but far below PKG-implied $5.73-$6.58 range and the DCF range of $12.46-$16.85. The gap is driven by BDN's much weaker profitability and leverage profile versus PKG, which supports a discount despite the apparent upside on a P/S basis.
Supporting Metrics