Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BDN stock price vs MAC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MAC's multiple
Needs MAC P/S.
Implied fair value · at BDN's multiple
Needs BDN P/S.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Brandywine Realty Trust · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
MACERICH CO · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BXP, Inc.
BDN vs BXP
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.
BDN vs HIW
KILROY REALTY CORP
BDN vs KRC
SL GREEN REALTY CORP
BDN vs SLG
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
BDN vs VNO
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC /DE/
BDN vs SPG
KIMCO REALTY CORP
BDN vs KIM
Brixmor Property Group Inc.
BDN vs BRX
REGENCY CENTERS CORP
BDN vs REG
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
BDN vs FRT
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BDN can stabilize revenue and sustain its current profitability while closing part of the valuation gap to MAC, then a constructive view is justified because BDN trades far below MAC-implied P/S value and below the DCF range; if not, the weak F-Score and declining revenue argue for caution.
BDN trades at 1.2x P/S versus MAC at 6.6x, which drives a large implied price gap to $18.31 from the current $3.25. However, MAC-based upside is difficult to treat as clean value because MAC also has weak profitability and high leverage, while BDN’s own fundamentals remain under pressure.
Supporting Metrics
