Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BCO stock price vs TGT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at TGT's multiple
Needs TGT P/E.
Implied fair value · at BCO's multiple
Needs BCO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
15 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
BRINK’S CO · implied price per share
Bear
$57.22
Base
$76.62
Bull
$101.88
Target Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
BCO vs UPS
FEDEX CORP
BCO vs FDX
C. H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
BCO vs CHRW
GXO Logistics, Inc.
BCO vs GXO
Walmart Inc.
BCO vs WMT
AMAZON COM INC
BCO vs AMZN
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW
BCO vs COST
BEST BUY CO INC
BCO vs BBY
ROSS STORES, INC.
BCO vs ROST
NORDSTROM INC
BCO vs JWN
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BCO can sustain its stronger margins and 5.0% revenue growth without balance-sheet deterioration, then the stock can be justified on operating quality; however, based on the current TGT P/E framework and elevated leverage, the more prudent action is to wait for a better entry or clearer de-leveraging before adding exposure.
BCO trades above TGT-based implied value at $115.61 versus $86.16, implying 25.5% downside on the stated P/E framework. The gap looks driven by BCO’s higher P/E and P/S versus TGT, even though BCO earns better margins and growth.
Supporting Metrics
