Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BBWI stock price vs KEYS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KEYS's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KEYS P/E.
Implied fair value · at BBWI's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, BBWI P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Bath & Body Works, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Keysight Technologies, Inc. · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
BBWI · not enough data.
KEYS · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Victoria's Secret & Co.
BBWI vs VSCO
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO /DE/
BBWI vs ANF
ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC
BBWI vs EL
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
BBWI vs ULTA
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
BBWI vs SBH
Fortive Corp
BBWI vs FTV
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
BBWI vs TDY
MKS INSTRUMENTS INC
BBWI vs MKSI
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
BBWI vs ROP
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BBWI can reaccelerate revenue growth while sustaining its high ROIC, then BBWI could be attractive because it trades near the bottom of its historical range and well below DCF and KEYS-implied values; otherwise, the current discount appears justified by weaker margins and flat growth versus KEYS.
BBWI trades at 7.1x P/E versus KEYS at 63.9x, which mechanically drives the huge implied price gap, but the two businesses are not directly comparable on growth and quality. BBWI is also far cheaper on P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, yet its current price sits near the bottom of its own historical band.
Supporting Metrics
