Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BBCP stock price vs RPM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at RPM's multiple
Needs RPM P/E.
Implied fair value · at BBCP's multiple
Needs BBCP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CEMEX SAB DE CV
BBCP vs CX
Arcosa, Inc.
BBCP vs ACA
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
BBCP vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
BBCP vs PRIM
MASTEC INC
BBCP vs MTZ
TUTOR PERINI CORP
BBCP vs TPC
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
BBCP vs PPG
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO
BBCP vs SHW
MASCO CORP /DE/
BBCP vs MAS
ECOLAB INC.
BBCP vs ECL
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO
BBCP vs EMN
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
BBCP vs DD
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BBCP can reaccelerate revenue growth and sustain margins without adding balance-sheet stress, then the stock could work as a valuation recovery trade, but based on the current data the cleaner action is to avoid or underweight BBCP because its earnings multiple, weak growth, and low quality scores do not justify the share price versus RPM.
BBCP trades at 123.4x P/E versus RPM at 20.9x, yet the implied price from RPM multiple is only $1.88 versus the current $11.11, indicating an 83.1% downside on this basis. The valuation gap is not offset by stronger growth or profitability, since BBCP has negative revenue growth and much lower net margin than RPM.
Supporting Metrics
