Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BBCP stock price vs PPL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PPL's multiple
Needs PPL P/E.
Implied fair value · at BBCP's multiple
Needs BBCP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
PPL Corp · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CEMEX SAB DE CV
BBCP vs CX
Arcosa, Inc.
BBCP vs ACA
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
BBCP vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
BBCP vs PRIM
MASTEC INC
BBCP vs MTZ
TUTOR PERINI CORP
BBCP vs TPC
NEXTERA ENERGY INC
BBCP vs NEE
DOMINION ENERGY, INC
BBCP vs D
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC
BBCP vs AEP
SOUTHERN CO
BBCP vs SO
FIRSTENERGY CORP
BBCP vs FE
Duke Energy CORP
BBCP vs DUK
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BBCP’s low P/E is being distorted by temporary earnings weakness rather than a permanent deterioration in business quality, then the stock looks worth holding or accumulating because it trades inside its historical band and below the DCF range despite similar ROIC and lower EV/EBITDA than PPL.
BBCP’s $11.11 price sits inside its historical band of $10.00-$12.22 and well below the DCF range of $17.10-$23.13, but the P/E-based implied price of $2.09 is far below current trading. The gap is driven by BBCP’s much higher P/E of 123.4x versus PPL’s 23.2x, even though BBCP screens cheaper on EV/EBITDA and EV/Revenue.
Supporting Metrics
