Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BBCP stock price vs LCID: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at LCID's multiple
Needs LCID P/E.
Implied fair value · at BBCP's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, BBCP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Lucid Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CEMEX SAB DE CV
BBCP vs CX
Arcosa, Inc.
BBCP vs ACA
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
BBCP vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
BBCP vs PRIM
MASTEC INC
BBCP vs MTZ
TUTOR PERINI CORP
BBCP vs TPC
Tesla, Inc.
BBCP vs TSLA
Rivian Automotive, Inc. / DE
BBCP vs RIVN
FORD MOTOR CO
BBCP vs F
General Motors Co
BBCP vs GM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BBCP can sustain its current profitability and avoid balance-sheet deterioration despite -7.7% revenue growth, then BBCP looks attractive because it trades below both its LCID-implied value and DCF range while outperforming LCID on every key profitability metric.
BBCP trades at $9.73 versus an implied price of $16.43, suggesting 68.9% upside from LCID-based P/S framework. The gap is driven less by size and more by quality: BBCP has positive margins and earnings while LCID has deeply negative profitability across the stack.
Supporting Metrics
