Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BBCP stock price vs ACM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ACM's multiple
Needs ACM P/E.
Implied fair value · at BBCP's multiple
Needs BBCP P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AECOM · implied price per share
Bear
$53.28
Base
$64.22
Bull
$78.47
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CEMEX SAB DE CV
BBCP vs CX
Arcosa, Inc.
BBCP vs ACA
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC
BBCP vs GVA
Primoris Services Corp
BBCP vs PRIM
MASTEC INC
BBCP vs MTZ
TUTOR PERINI CORP
BBCP vs TPC
JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC.
BBCP vs J
KBR, INC.
BBCP vs KBR
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.
BBCP vs PWR
TETRA TECH INC
BBCP vs TTEK
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BBCP can stabilize revenue and improve earnings quality while reducing leverage, then the current price may be defensible; otherwise, ACM looks cleaner on capital efficiency and balance-sheet strength, making BBCP’s valuation harder to justify on a relative basis.
On a P/E basis, BBCP is far more expensive than ACM at 123.4x versus 16.1x, which is consistent with the very large negative implied price of $1.45 versus the current $11.11. However, BBCP also trades at a higher P/S and EV/Revenue than ACM, while EV/EBITDA is only modestly above ACM, suggesting the gap is driven more by earnings quality and capital structure than by a simple enterprise value mismatch.
Supporting Metrics
