Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BABA stock price vs WFC: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WFC's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, WFC P/E.
Implied fair value · at BABA's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, BABA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Higher is better
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd · implied price per share
USD conversion is unavailable for the reporting currency.
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN · implied price per share
Reporting currency could not be verified.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
WFC · not enough data.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AMAZON COM INC
BABA vs AMZN
EBAY INC
BABA vs EBAY
PDD Holdings Inc.
BABA vs PDD
JD.com, Inc.
BABA vs JD
Sea Ltd
BABA vs SE
MERCADOLIBRE INC
BABA vs MELI
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
BABA vs JPM
Bank of America Corporation
BABA vs BAC
Citigroup Inc.
BABA vs C
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
BABA vs GS
Morgan Stanley
BABA vs MS
Capital One Financial Corporation
BABA vs COF
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP
BABA vs TFC
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BABA can materially improve operating efficiency and convert its revenue growth into stronger ROIC, then wait for a better entry or require a much lower valuation because the current multiple set is far above WFC and above the DCF range.
BABA trades at a large premium to WFC on both earnings and sales multiples, yet the model’s implied price is far below the current price. The gap is driven by BABA’s much richer P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue multiples, which are inconsistent with WFC and DCF ranges provided.
Supporting Metrics
