Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: BABA stock price vs KNX: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KNX's multiple
Needs Annual EPS, KNX P/E.
Implied fair value · at BABA's multiple
Needs BABA P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd · implied price per share
USD conversion is unavailable for the reporting currency.
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
AMAZON COM INC
BABA vs AMZN
EBAY INC
BABA vs EBAY
PDD Holdings Inc.
BABA vs PDD
JD.com, Inc.
BABA vs JD
Sea Ltd
BABA vs SE
MERCADOLIBRE INC
BABA vs MELI
HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES INC
BABA vs JBHT
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
BABA vs WERN
FEDEX CORP
BABA vs FDX
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
BABA vs UPS
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
BABA vs CAR
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORP
BABA vs WAB
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe BABA can sustain its 8.1% revenue growth and improve its poor ROIC of -37.3%, then BABA looks worth owning because it offers 31.5% implied upside while still trading below KNX-implied $160.76 BABA.
BABA's implied price of $160.76 suggests 31.5% upside from the current $122.25, while its current price sits within but below the upper half of the historical band of $110.03-$134.48 and inside the DCF range of $86.06-$116.44 only marginally above the top end. The relative valuation picture looks distorted because both companies trade on elevated earnings multiples, but BABA has materially stronger revenue and margin generation than KNX.
Supporting Metrics
