Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AZO stock price vs ECL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ECL's multiple
Needs ECL P/E.
Implied fair value · at AZO's multiple
Needs AZO P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AUTOZONE INC · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ECOLAB INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$44.93
Base
$57.49
Bull
$73.86
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
O REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC
AZO vs ORLY
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
AZO vs AAP
GENUINE PARTS CO
AZO vs GPC
ETHAN ALLEN INTERIORS INC
AZO vs ETD
NORDSTROM INC
AZO vs JWN
ROSS STORES, INC.
AZO vs ROST
Procter & Gamble Company
AZO vs PG
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
AZO vs CL
CLOROX CO /DE/
AZO vs CLX
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP
AZO vs KMB
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AZO can sustain its superior ROIC and margin profile without a material deterioration in leverage or cash conversion, then the relative valuation gap versus ECL supports owning AZO because AZO is cheaper on every major multiple despite comparable growth.
AZO trades at a clear valuation discount to ECL on P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, and EV/Revenue, even though AZO’s growth and profitability are broadly comparable or better. The current price of $3110.05 sits above the top of the DCF range but below ECL-implied range and within the historical band, suggesting the market is valuing AZO more conservatively than ECL.
Supporting Metrics
