Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AVGO stock price vs NTAP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at NTAP's multiple
Needs NTAP P/E.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
NetApp, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$88.82
Base
$102.84
Bull
$121.94
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
NVIDIA Corporation
AVGO vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
AVGO vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
AVGO vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
AVGO vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
AVGO vs CSCO
Pure Storage, Inc.
AVGO vs PSTG
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
AVGO vs IBM
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
AVGO vs MU
Dell Technologies Inc.
AVGO vs DELL
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
AVGO vs STX
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co
AVGO vs HPE
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Edwyn research
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AVGO can continue compounding revenue at a 23.9% rate while maintaining 39.9% operating margins and sustaining premium market multiples, then hold or add selectively; if you expect valuation to mean-revert toward NTAP implied, historical, or DCF ranges, then reduce exposure because the current price sits far above all three frameworks.
The provided P/E-based implied price of $115.81 is far below AVGO's current price of $360.45, implying -67.9% downside, even though AVGO trades at a higher P/E than NTAP. On absolute trading multiples, AVGO is much more expensive than NTAP on P/S and EV-based metrics, which helps explain why a NTAP-relative valuation screen could flag a large discount to current price.
Supporting Metrics
