Broadcom Inc.
—- Market cap
- $1.11T
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$16.18B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AVGO stock price vs CHTR: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at CHTR's multiple
Needs CHTR P/E.
Implied fair value · at AVGO's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Broadcom Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Charter Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
NVIDIA Corporation
AVGO vs NVDA
Intel Corporation
AVGO vs INTC
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
AVGO vs AMD
QUALCOMM Incorporated
AVGO vs QCOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
AVGO vs CSCO
COMCAST CORP
AVGO vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
AVGO vs LUMN
AT&T INC.
AVGO vs T
T-Mobile US, Inc.
AVGO vs TMUS
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC
AVGO vs VZ
Clearfield, Inc.
AVGO vs CLFD
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AVGO can sustain its 23.9% revenue growth and 39.9% operating margin long enough to justify a 48.6x P/E, then hold or stay constructive; otherwise, the relative valuation versus CHTR, the DCF range, and the historical band all argue for caution.
AVGO trades at a sharp premium to CHTR across earnings, sales, and cash-flow proxies, while the provided implied price suggests severe downside from the current level. The gap is driven by AVGO’s much stronger growth and margin profile, but the current valuation still appears far richer than CHTR on a relative basis.
Supporting Metrics