Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
FY 2025 · View financials
Decision snapshot: ATUS stock price vs RUSHA: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at RUSHA's multiple
Needs RUSHA P/S.
Implied fair value · at ATUS's multiple
Needs ATUS P/S.
Live quote
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Pricing power
Operating leverage
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Core statements aligned to each company's latest fiscal year.
SEC periods: ATUS FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025) · RUSHA FY 2025 (ended Dec 31, 2025).
Trendline
Five fiscal years of revenue, earnings, and margins before underwriting a re-rating.
Price framework
Market cap plus debt, less cash.
Price framework
Discounted free cash flow, then bridged to a per-share price. Same assumptions applied to both companies.
Optimum Communications, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
-$10.42
Base
-$12.26
Bull
-$14.10
RUSH ENTERPRISES, INC. · implied price per share
Bear
$31.09
Base
$36.57
Bull
$42.06
Balance sheet health
Financial health checks to separate durable balance sheets from potential value traps.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Debt / equity
Total debt against shareholders' equity
-11.35x
0.12x
Net debt / EBITDA
Leverage against operating earnings
9.43x
0.09x
Cash and equivalents
Liquid reserves on the balance sheet
$1.01B
$212.65M
Total debt
Interest-bearing obligations outstanding
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/
ATUS vs CHTR
COMCAST CORP
ATUS vs CMCSA
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
ATUS vs LUMN
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
ATUS vs FYBR
LITHIA MOTORS INC
ATUS vs LAD
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
ATUS vs PAG
GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC
ATUS vs GPI
CARMAX INC
ATUS vs KMX
$26.27B
$274.93M
Live quote
LLM-powered synthesis
An on-demand narrative read of the same deterministic data.
Based on an earlier data snapshot. Review the filing dates below or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ATUS can materially improve operating margins and reduce leverage from 9.4x net debt/EBITDA, then the stock may deserve a higher valuation; otherwise, RUSHA remains the higher-quality relative choice because it is profitable, earns a 17.4% ROIC, and carries far less balance sheet risk.
The only explicit RUSHA-implied valuation provided is $14.98, while the valuation reference for ATUS shows an implied price of $15.36, indicating a very small premium to RUSHA anchor. However, the DCF range of $39.09 to $52.89 sits far above both figures, creating a large gap between intrinsic and relative valuation signals.
Supporting Metrics
