Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: APH stock price vs MOS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MOS's multiple
Needs MOS P/E.
Implied fair value · at APH's multiple
Needs APH P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMPHENOL CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
MOSAIC CO · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TE Connectivity plc
APH vs TEL
CORNING INC /NY
APH vs GLW
CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
APH vs COMM
HUBBELL INC
APH vs HUBB
BEL FUSE INC /NJ
APH vs BELFA
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC
APH vs VSH
Nutrien Ltd.
APH vs NTR
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
APH vs CF
KRONOS WORLDWIDE INC
APH vs KRO
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe APH’s superior margins, growth, and ROIC deserve a persistent premium and the MOS-based MOS valuation is not an appropriate anchor, then hold or accumulate APH because its operating quality materially exceeds MOS despite the headline relative downside.
APH’s current price of $164.59 is far above the MOS-based implied price of $41.51, which reflects a -74.8% downside gap on that relative valuation framework. The gap is driven by APH’s much higher profitability and growth profile, which makes a direct comparison to MOS look overly punitive but also highlights that MOS is not a clean comp for APH.
Supporting Metrics
