Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: APH stock price vs GSAT: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at GSAT's multiple
Needs GSAT P/E.
Implied fair value · at APH's multiple
Needs Annual EPS is negative, APH P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMPHENOL CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
GLOBALSTAR, INC. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
TE Connectivity plc
APH vs TEL
CORNING INC /NY
APH vs GLW
CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
APH vs COMM
HUBBELL INC
APH vs HUBB
BEL FUSE INC /NJ
APH vs BELFA
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC
APH vs VSH
VIASAT INC
APH vs VSAT
EchoStar CORP
APH vs SATS
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. /DE/
APH vs LHX
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
APH vs ASTS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe APH can sustain its superior margins, ROIC, and growth while the market continues to reward quality, then hold or accumulate on pullbacks; however, if your decision is based on GSAT-implied $699.58 price alone, be cautious because that benchmark is inflated by GSAT's weak fundamentals and APH already trades well above its DCF range.
GSAT-based valuation implies APH could rise from $164.59 to $699.58, but that comparison is distorted because GSAT is a much smaller, lower-quality business with negative net income and far weaker operating economics. APH is closer to its historical trading band than to GSAT-implied level, which suggests the apparent 325.0% upside is not an economically realistic anchor.
Supporting Metrics
