Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AOS stock price vs AWK: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at AWK's multiple
Needs AWK P/E.
Implied fair value · at AOS's multiple
Needs AOS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
A. O. Smith Corporation · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC. · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC
AOS vs WTS
Mueller Water Products, Inc.
AOS vs MWA
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC
AOS vs LII
Avery Dennison Corp
AOS vs AVY
LEGGETT & PLATT INC
AOS vs LEG
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
AOS vs MTD
ATMOS ENERGY CORP
AOS vs ATO
ALLIANT ENERGY CORP
AOS vs LNT
Evergy, Inc.
AOS vs EVRG
PPL Corp
AOS vs PPL
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC
AOS vs PEG
DTE ENERGY CO
AOS vs DTE
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AOS can re-accelerate growth or sustain its high ROIC without taking on leverage, then the stock looks attractive relative to AWK because it is much cheaper on P/E, P/S, and EV/EBITDA while maintaining a stronger balance sheet.
AOS trades at a large valuation discount to AWK, with a 15.6x P/E versus 23.6x, 1.2x P/S versus 5.2x, and 6.0x EV/EBITDA versus 12.8x. The implied price of $90.78 suggests 51.0% upside, but AOS already sits above the top of its historical band and inside the DCF range, which tempers the case for a simple re-rating.
Supporting Metrics
