ANSYS, Inc.
—- Market cap
- —
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- —
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ANSS stock price vs KEYS: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at KEYS's multiple
Needs KEYS P/E.
Implied fair value · at ANSS's multiple
Needs ANSS P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Nine period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
ANSYS, Inc. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
Autodesk, Inc.
ANSS vs ADSK
TRIMBLE INC.
ANSS vs TRMB
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC
ANSS vs CDNS
Altair Engineering Inc.
ANSS vs ALTR
PTC INC.
ANSS vs PTC
ADOBE INC.
ANSS vs ADBE
Fortive Corp
ANSS vs FTV
TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC
ANSS vs TDY
MKS INSTRUMENTS INC
ANSS vs MKSI
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
ANSS vs ROP
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ANSS can sustain its 12.1% revenue growth and 89.0% gross margin profile, then a constructive stance on ANSS is justified because its operating quality is clearly better than KEYS, but the wide gap versus the DCF range argues for patience on entry price.
The data suggests a large disconnect between the P/E-based implied price of $425.66 and the DCF range of $67.32 to $91.08, but the lack of current price and ANSS-specific trading multiples prevents a clean relative valuation call. On KEYS side, KEYS trades at 65.0x P/E and 10.1x P/S, implying the market already pays up for quality in this segment.
Supporting Metrics