American Tower Corporation
—- Market cap
- $81.73B
- Debt
- —
- Cash
- −$1.47B
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMT stock price vs WY: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at WY's multiple
Needs WY P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMT's multiple
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CROWN CASTLE INC.
AMT vs CCI
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
AMT vs SBAC
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
AMT vs DLR
WELLTOWER INC.
AMT vs WELL
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
AMT vs CSGP
Prologis, Inc.
AMT vs PLD
RAYONIER INC
AMT vs RYN
POTLATCHDELTIC CORP
AMT vs PCH
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO /NEW/
AMT vs IP
UFP INDUSTRIES INC
AMT vs UFPI
VORNADO REALTY TRUST
AMT vs VNO
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AMT can sustain its superior margins and positive revenue growth without balance-sheet deterioration, then holding or accumulating makes sense because AMT is fundamentally stronger than WY and already trades at a lower P/E despite premium sales-based multiples.
AMT's implied price of $306.96 versus its current price of $172.54 suggests 77.9% upside on the stated P/E basis, but that framework is inconsistent with the fact that AMT already trades at a lower P/E than WY (32.0x vs 56.8x). The market appears to be awarding AMT a premium for stronger profitability and growth, while WY comparison itself shows WY has a lower P/S but a higher EV/EBITDA, highlighting that the relative valuation picture is not straightforward.
Supporting Metrics