Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMT stock price vs ORCL: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at ORCL's multiple
Needs ORCL P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMT's multiple
Needs AMT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
12 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
ORACLE CORP · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CROWN CASTLE INC.
AMT vs CCI
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
AMT vs SBAC
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
AMT vs DLR
WELLTOWER INC.
AMT vs WELL
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
AMT vs CSGP
Prologis, Inc.
AMT vs PLD
Microsoft Corporation
AMT vs MSFT
Amazon.com, Inc.
AMT vs AMZN
Alphabet Inc.
AMT vs GOOGL
International Business Machines Corporation
AMT vs IBM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
AMT vs CSCO
Salesforce, Inc.
AMT vs CRM
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AMT can sustain a valuation premium despite slower growth because of its stronger margins, then hold; otherwise, reduce exposure because AMT is priced above ORCL-implied value while also carrying materially higher leverage than ORCL.
AMT trades above ORCL-implied valuation at $168.07 versus an implied price of $133.74, implying -20.4% downside. The discount is hard to justify on relative growth and balance-sheet metrics because AMT has lower revenue growth and much higher leverage than ORCL.
Supporting Metrics
