Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AMT stock price vs IRM: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at IRM's multiple
Needs IRM P/E.
Implied fair value · at AMT's multiple
Needs AMT P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
IRON MOUNTAIN INC · implied price per share
Latest annual free cash flow must be positive to qualify the filing-backed baseline.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
CROWN CASTLE INC.
AMT vs CCI
SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP
AMT vs SBAC
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
AMT vs DLR
WELLTOWER INC.
AMT vs WELL
COSTAR GROUP, INC.
AMT vs CSGP
Prologis, Inc.
AMT vs PLD
EQUINIX INC
AMT vs EQIX
Public Storage
AMT vs PSA
MAXIMUS, INC.
AMT vs MMS
ROLLINS INC
AMT vs ROL
CINTAS CORP
AMT vs CTAS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AMT’s stronger margins and earnings quality will outweigh IRM’s faster growth and higher ROIC, then hold or selectively add to AMT because the stock trades well below IRM-implied P/E value but near the top of its DCF range.
AMT’s current price of $172.32 is dramatically below IRM-implied P/E value of $1,376.89, but that figure appears distorted by IRM’s very high 255.0x P/E. The more grounded range check shows AMT sitting near the top of its DCF range and above the historical band midpoint, suggesting AMT is not obviously cheap on every framework.
Supporting Metrics
