Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AME stock price vs PH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PH's multiple
Needs PH P/E.
Implied fair value · at AME's multiple
Needs AME P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
17 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
AMETEK, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$78.63
Base
$93.91
Bull
$113.81
Parker-Hannifin Corp · implied price per share
Bear
$271.45
Base
$330.29
Bull
$406.93
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
AME vs HON
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
AME vs EMR
CURTISS WRIGHT CORP
AME vs CW
Avery Dennison Corp
AME vs AVY
METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATIONAL INC/
AME vs MTD
NORDSON CORP
AME vs NDSN
Eaton Corp plc
AME vs ETN
DANAHER CORP /DE/
AME vs DHR
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
AME vs ITW
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AME will maintain its margin and revenue-growth premium and eventually re-rate to historical/PH multiples, then consider initiating or adding to a position because the firm's superior margins (e.g., gross margin 35.7% and revenue growth 5.2%) and strong quality scores justify paying a premium; otherwise, trim or avoid because current price sits ~8.6% above PH-implied P/E.
AME's current price ($223.99) is above PH-implied P/E implied price ($204.63), implying an expected downside of -8.6%. The gap is driven by AME trading at higher absolute multiples (P/E and P/S) than PARKER even though some operating metrics are stronger for AME.
Supporting Metrics
