Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: AIG stock price vs PH: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at PH's multiple
Needs PH P/E.
Implied fair value · at AIG's multiple
Needs AIG P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth lag
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
17 period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
American International Group, Inc. · implied price per share
Five annual free-cash-flow observations are required for the filing-backed baseline.
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION · implied price per share
Bear
$271.45
Base
$330.29
Bull
$406.93
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC
AIG vs BRK-B
ALLSTATE CORP
AIG vs ALL
PROGRESSIVE CORP/OH/
AIG vs PGR
Chubb Ltd
AIG vs CB
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
AIG vs HON
NORDSON CORP
AIG vs NDSN
Eaton Corp plc
AIG vs ETN
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
AIG vs EMR
DANAHER CORP /DE/
AIG vs DHR
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
AIG vs ITW
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe AIG can close part of the profitability and capital-efficiency gap to PH while sustaining its stronger balance sheet, then AIG could rerate meaningfully because its current multiples are far below PH's; otherwise, the discount is likely justified by weaker margins and lower quality.
AIG trades at a significant valuation discount to PH across earnings, sales, and cash-flow proxies, which is consistent with the market assigning a much lower quality multiple to AIG. However, the supplied valuation output also implies a 133.9% upside to $175.31, which appears to be driven by the P/E framework rather than the broader cross-company comp set.
Supporting Metrics
