Compare price, profitability, solvency, and SEC-reported financials side by side—before deciding which assumptions deserve a closer look.
Decision snapshot: ADSK stock price vs MCHP: inconclusive Relative valuation is incomplete for this pair. Review the available filing metrics before drawing a conclusion.
Quick read
Each company valued on the other's multiple, then compared with the market price.
Implied fair value · at MCHP's multiple
Needs MCHP P/E.
Implied fair value · at ADSK's multiple
Needs ADSK P/E.
Price unavailable
Metric by metric
Where each company leads, and how wide the gap is.
Growth edge
Reported gross margin
Operating income + D&A
Lower is better
Not comparable
Lower leverage
Statements
Annual statements in reported currencies, with calculations and source evidence.
Values retain reported currencies and share bases. Select a figure to inspect its period, calculation and filing inputs. Differences require compatible units and periods.
Explore enterprise value and market valuation multiples in the valuation sections.
Trendline
Eight period-end years of reported revenue, earnings, and margins. Periods and currencies are shown with the data.
Price framework
USD market cap plus reported borrowing debt, less cash and equivalents. This EV proxy excludes investments, preferred stock and noncontrolling-interest adjustments.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Complete market value, debt and cash evidence is required for enterprise value.
Price framework
The same filing-backed model used on each company's valuation page, with company-specific inputs and calculated scenarios.
Autodesk, Inc. · implied price per share
Bear
$122.90
Base
$144.16
Bull
$171.85
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED · implied price per share
Debt and bridge-cash inputs are required to translate enterprise value into equity value.
Balance sheet health
Inspect reported liquidity and leverage alongside historical financial-health checks.
Financial strength on a 0–9 scale.
Bankruptcy-risk signal from balance sheet and earnings power.
Not enough data to score either balance sheet.
Cash excludes investments. EBITDA is an operating-income-plus-D&A proxy. Missing borrowing categories remain unavailable; select a value to inspect its inputs.
Comparable set
Where the pair sits against the wider comparable set.
Keep comparing
Open adjacent comparisons from the same industry to pressure-test the read across multiple pairs.
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
ADSK vs WLY
TRIMBLE INC.
ADSK vs TRMB
NVIDIA CORP
ADSK vs NVDA
ADOBE INC.
ADSK vs ADBE
ANSYS INC
ADSK vs ANSS
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
ADSK vs TYL
INTEL CORP
ADSK vs INTC
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
ADSK vs TXN
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
ADSK vs AMD
QUALCOMM INC/DE
ADSK vs QCOM
APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
ADSK vs AMAT
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
ADSK vs SWKS
LLM-powered synthesis
An explanation of the financial evidence. Check its snapshot date against the figures above.
This explanation uses an earlier data snapshot or evidence version. Review its generation date and the current figures, or refresh after signing in.
If you believe ADSK can sustain its 17.5% revenue growth and 48.6% ROIC while remaining within its historical valuation band, then favor ADSK over MCHP because ADSK shows better fundamentals at lower operating multiples and much lower net leverage.
On a relative basis, ADSK screens cheaper than MCHP on every listed operating multiple except P/E, with much lower EV/Revenue and EV/EBITDA despite stronger growth and profitability. The implied P/E price of $2013.31 appears mechanically distorted versus the current price of $249.08, so MCHP-based range and historical band are more useful than the single implied number.
Supporting Metrics
